Further to my earlier post Case Reference Number FS50285682
As a result of the Information Commissioners involvement in my Freedom of Information request I have now received some further information from the council. Just a pity this was not the information I wanted.
I already know why they couldn't adopt any of the roads from the Eastern end of Rookery Rise, what I want to know is why they didn't adopt any of the roads from the Western end of Rookery Rise. Something they could have done as early as 2005. And if Vale Royal had actually done their job properly as early as 2001.
What is interesting about their response is that it provides proof that have also misled others about the true position of the development and the roads.